Archive: 2026
One bourbon maker is aging spirits on a barge in the Mississippi for a unique flavor
Jesus Christ Kinski by Benjamin Myers review, inside the mind of an actor in meltdown
'The Bear' is back in the kitchen
The Era of Penumbra (The Rise of Penumbra 3) by Yona Katz
Playwright Anna Deavere Smith tells her own family story in 'Basil Biggs'
The Obamas team up with Larry David in this irreverent look at American history
My Newborn Refusing to Eat Challenged Everything I Thought I Knew
Exclusive Cover Reveal of “Secrets and Other Hobbies” by Mary Hannah Terzino
Finding My Way by Marc A. Crowley
The American Library Association is auctioning off some primo vintage READ posters.
📚 The damage is done
Commonwealth Foundation Clears Writers Accused of Using AI
650+ New Queer Books Out in 2026 (So Far)
Books by Latine Authors to Preorder Now (and Other Ways to Support Books and Authors)
California’s proposed billionaire tax: what you need to know
Big cat spotted roaming through countryside
Carbon Captured
There’s an escaped giraffe on the run in Texas. Why was she there at all?
6-alarm fire destroys old industrial building in Allentown, Pennsylvania
Say Goodbye to The Big Bang Theory as HBO Pulls the Plug on a Sitcom Era
Marvel's Ultimate Universe: Finale #1 Introduces All-New X-Men Team Ahead of MCU Return
Lionsgate Is Officially Rebooting 27-Year-Old Horror Classic With New Movie
DC’s New Green Lantern Channels Sailor Moon’s 90s Magical Girl Style
10 Top Spider-Man Comics of the 2000s
Brendan Fraser's Raunchy New Tubi Show Drops Adults-Only First Look
Jackass: Best and Last Debuts With Record RT Score
The FX Show That Will Dethrone Fallout as the King of Video Game TV Gets Major Cast Update
Hugh Jackman's New Detective Comedy With 95% Is Officially a Prime Video Hit as The Death of Robin Hood Underwhelms
Pokémon Winds and Waves Is Officially Bringing Back the Red and Blue Era
Werwulf: First Look Image From Director Robert Eggers New Film
Stranger Things: Brown Made an Eleven's Fate "Pledge" with Duffers
Takara Tomy's New Overgear Optimus Prime is Locked and Loaded
The Americas, Tom Hanks Returning for Season 2 in 2028; Specials Set
My Adventures with Superman S03E03 Preview: We've Got Dueling Supermen
Hannah Murray Stopped Playing Make-Believe
The Paper Season 2 Set for September 9th: Images, Overview Released
The Animal Kingdom Is a Criminal Enterprise in Breaking Bear
Rush Hour Duel Released To Celebrate Game's 30th Anniversary
Charli XCX Met John Cale Mid-Breakdown
Common Side Effects Returns in 2027; New Season 2 Images Released
Amazon, Artificial, and the New (Old) Hollywood
List Any Absolute Batman On eBay At A Ridiculous Buy It Now Price…
Emmy Rossum and Liz Meriwether Let Themselves Get Angry
Blokees DC Defender Version 02: Justice League Collection Coming Soon
The Bear Trims the Fat
‘Watch the Movie. That’s My Voice Coming Out of Rachael Leigh Cook’s Mouth.’
Kindergarten Wars Anime Casts Mirei Kumagai
Studio Khara to Produce Segment in Baahubali: The Eternal War Animated Film
Kazuma Kaneko's Tsukuyomi Game Launches for PC via Steam July 24
Bleach: Thousand-Year Blood War - The Calamity Anime Film Review
'Gokigenyō, Ikkyoku Ikaga?' Mahjong Manga Gets TV Anime
Masa Ichikawa to Launch New Joker Manga Based on DC Comics Character in Morning Magazine
Akane Torikai's Bad Babies Don't Cry Manga Ends
This Week in Anime - Happy 20th Birthday, Simoun!
MARRIAGETOXIN ‒ Episode 12
Tom Nichols: Trump's Trashy 250 Celebration
In the Middle East, Vance speaks softly, but Rubio carries a big stick
It Truly Sucks to Be a House Republican With Lofty Ambitions
Blakeman admits comparing Lander to concentration camp guard was ‘too strong’
ReThink pregnancy: Abortion industry scare tactics fail under scrutiny
Trump claims he drew at least 45,000 people to his America 250 rally
Trump Isn’t Policing the World, He’s Looting It
What Cletus Thinks About “Democracy”
Senate GOP tries to mend fences with Trump after heated lunch
Touch grass or stay miserable: Joe Concha’s message for Democrats skipping America 250
Appalachian Awakening: Rewriting American Music Culture
The Democratic establishment fueled the socialist hate it is now lamenting
Trump Won’t Rest Until He Runs Our Elections
Epstein Files
Data Center Opposition Is Uniting Communities, With Saul Levin
17 Rappers Have Supported Trump
Russell Vought’s Latest Plan to Gut the Government Should Terrify You
250 years in, Americans trust their doctor far more than their government
The Anti-Fascist Fabulist
Democratic Socialists topple Harlem incumbent with votes from 7% of registered Dems
Mamdani’s Selective Socialism
Keep the Mission, Expand the Resources
House probes IRS failure to nab tax dodgers in federal workforce; more than $6 billion owed
Prosecutions are up and crime is down: U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro on public safety in D.C.
Spencer Pratt and the Limits of Virality
Democratic Socialists Win Big
Is the U.S.-Israel Bond Breaking?
Belittled, ignored or gaslit, now we know the true cost of not listening to pregnant women | Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett
Tarmac playgrounds and windows that don’t open: why hot spells turn our schools into heat traps | Harry Paticas
Ben Jennings on a new idea for ‘carbon capture’, cartoon
The Guardian view on the Ockenden maternity review: lifting standards must be the number one priority | Editorial
Climate accountability deserves its day in court
Cambodia's crackdown on online scams shows that nobody is above the law
Don't pull apart what’s finally working to curb overdose deaths
The Knicks' victory offers interesting insight into US democracy
Congressional Democrats are playing 'war party' on Iran. It will backfire on them.
Massie and Greene could help conservatism survive Trumpism
Is a Democrat-majority Senate a good bet in the midterms?
Welcome to 'Xizang': China is quietly, permanently trying to erase Tibet
Congress caved on ICE funding, but can still act to protect detained children
Democrats grapple uncomfortably with World Cup success
NPS Claims Vandal Cut Reflecting Pool Liner After Costly Renovation
Click here or title to expand full summaryWhat the left says
Lean left“Trump Blamed Vandals for Reflecting Pool Failure. The Full Story Is Complicated.”
Left-leaning coverage of the Reflecting Pool saga has treated Trump's vandalism narrative with measured skepticism, noting that the president made the claim long before any evidence surfaced and that a court filing now offers only partial corroboration. PBS NewsHour framed the development as one data point inside a broader news cycle that also included a federal judge blocking Trump's executive order on mail-in voting, a pairing that placed the pool story inside a pattern of disputed presidential actions. Reason went furthest, arguing the debacle functions as a shorthand for Trump's second-term struggles: a president forcing his most loyal supporters to defend outcomes that reflect poorly on his administration's competence. That framing casts the vandalism claim less as exoneration and more as spin. The left-leaning read emphasizes that $16 billion was spent, the pool still failed visibly and quickly, and one cut liner does not fully account for the scale of that failure.
What the right says
Right“Court Filing Confirms Vandals Cut Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Liner”
Right-leaning outlets seized on the NPS court filing as vindication for Trump's early claims that the pool was sabotaged. Breitbart led with the specific physical detail: a knife or razor blade cut into the sealant liner, treated as confirmation rather than a piece of a larger puzzle. The Washington Times described it as the Trump administration showing evidence for the first time, framing the disclosure as the administration finally cutting through media skepticism. The Dispatch took a more careful approach, fact-checking Trump's claims and acknowledging that the vandalism evidence exists but that the president had made broader assertions not fully supported by the filing. Still, the dominant right-leaning angle is that critics who dismissed the vandalism claim owe the administration a correction. The framing casts media and political opponents as having rushed to mock a renovation failure without waiting for facts that ultimately supported, at least in part, the official explanation.
Supreme Court Clears Path for Trump to End TPS Protections, Reshape Asylum
Click here or title to expand full summaryWhat the left says
Lean left“Supreme Court Strips Deportation Protections From Hundreds of Thousands of Immigrants”
Left-leaning outlets frame Thursday's rulings as a painful, racially charged blow to vulnerable immigrant communities. The Guardian and Slate emphasize the 6-3 split and characterize the decisions as green-lighting Trump's mass deportation agenda, with Slate calling it a win for his 'mass deportation machine.' PBS NewsHour and CBS News foreground the human stakes, noting that Haitian TPS holders have lived legally in the United States for years and now face the prospect of removal to a country in political and humanitarian crisis. Reason, writing from a civil-liberties angle, argues the Haitian TPS decision is badly flawed because extensive evidence shows it was motivated by unconstitutional racial and ethnic discrimination, a dimension the majority sidestepped. The asylum metering ruling draws nearly as much alarm, with coverage stressing that it effectively allows the government to deny migrants the chance to invoke federal law protecting their right to seek protection.
What the right says
Right“Supreme Court Upholds Immigration Law as Written, Backing Trump's Border Policies”
National Review frames both rulings as a straightforward, welcome exercise in statutory fidelity: the court read the plain meaning of laws passed by Congress and found the Trump administration's immigration policies consistent with them. The framing pushes back on characterizations of the decisions as ideologically driven, arguing instead that the administration was simply following the letter of statutes that previous administrations had bent or ignored. The TPS ruling is cast as a vindication of executive authority to manage humanitarian visa programs within legal limits, and the asylum metering decision is presented as restoring a commonsense border enforcement tool that Biden had abandoned. For right-leaning coverage, the throughline is institutional legitimacy: a court applying written law, not legislating from the bench, delivering outcomes that reflect what Congress actually authorized.
Michigan childcare provider collected $1.1M in taxpayer funds despite no visible signs of operating
Click here or title to expand full summaryWhat the left has said
Inferred left“Michigan childcare fraud probe exposes gaps in oversight protecting low-income families”
For advocates of expanded childcare access, the Michigan case is a cautionary tale about what happens when oversight systems fail to keep up with program growth. Left-leaning coverage of It tends to foreground the families harmed most directly: low-income parents who depend on subsidized care and may have believed their children were enrolled somewhere safe. The structural concern is that underfunded state agencies, asked to manage surging childcare subsidy rolls, lack the inspectors and auditors needed to catch bad actors early. That framing positions the fraud not as an indictment of public spending on childcare, but as an argument for investing in the administrative infrastructure that makes such programs work. Advocates warn that using cases like this to cut childcare budgets would punish vulnerable families for a failure of government accountability, not a failure of the underlying program.
What the right says
Right“Michigan taxpayers billed $1.1M by childcare provider with no proof of operation”
From a right-leaning perspective, It is a textbook example of what happens when government programs expand faster than anyone can track where the money goes. Fox News framed the case squarely around taxpayer exposure: over a million dollars, no visible facility, no apparent oversight triggering a red flag. That framing positions the fraud as symptomatic of a broader pattern in which subsidy programs create easy financial targets because accountability mechanisms are weak or absent. Right-leaning coverage typically asks why agencies kept cutting checks without conducting basic site verification, and whether the program's design invited this kind of abuse. It fits a recurring conservative argument that government spending on social programs is not just inefficient but actively exploitable, and that accountability should come before any further expansion of childcare or similar entitlement programs.
MORNING GLORY: Democrats cliff dive over the far-left edge of American politics
Click here or title to expand full summaryDOJ threatens to sue California over 'Glock ban,' arguing law violates Second Amendment
Click here or title to expand full summaryWhat the left has said
Inferred left“Trump's DOJ Threatens to Sue California Over Gun Safety Law”
From a left-leaning perspective, the DOJ's threat reads as the federal government weaponizing its legal authority to dismantle a California gun safety measure that the state designed to keep dangerous weapons off its streets. Left-leaning coverage foregrounds California's argument that its handgun roster exists to ensure firearms sold in the state meet basic safety and reliability standards, not to ban guns outright. Advocates on this side warn that the DOJ's intervention sets a chilling precedent, using Second Amendment absolutism to override state-level public health policy at a moment when gun violence remains a leading cause of death in the United States. The framing casts California as a responsible actor being bullied by a federal administration ideologically aligned with the gun lobby, and raises alarms about what other state-level firearm regulations could face similar federal pressure.
What the right says
Right“DOJ Moves to Protect Gun Rights by Challenging California's Glock Ban”
Right-leaning coverage treats the DOJ's warning as a long-overdue federal check on California's aggressive campaign to restrict the firearms law-abiding citizens can purchase. The Glock ban, in this framing, is not a safety measure but a deliberate scheme to make it legally impossible for Californians to buy the most popular and widely owned handguns in the country, effectively nullifying Second Amendment rights for millions. Fox News and outlets sharing that lean emphasize the constitutional clarity here: the Supreme Court's Bruen decision in 2022 firmly established that gun regulations must be grounded in historical tradition, and California's roster system has no such basis. The DOJ stepping in is cast as the federal government finally doing its job, defending individual rights against a state that has spent decades testing the outer limits of what the Constitution permits.
Top Democrat requests info from Reflecting Pool contractors
Click here or title to expand full summaryCalifornia teacher pregnancy leave bill could create paid leave for abortions
Click here or title to expand full summaryWhat the left says
Lean left“California Moves to Protect Teachers' Reproductive Health Choices With Paid Leave”
Left-leaning coverage of this bill frames it as a natural extension of California's post-Dobbs commitment to reproductive rights, positioning the abortion leave provision not as a controversy but as a baseline protection for workers. In that reading, teachers, like all employees, should not have to choose between their job security and their reproductive healthcare decisions. The Newsom administration's broader record on abortion access gives the provision ideological coherence in progressive framing: California has consistently positioned itself as a sanctuary state for reproductive rights, and paid leave for abortion fits neatly into that architecture. Critics who object to the provision, in left-leaning framing, are attempting to single out abortion for exclusion from standard workplace protections that apply to other medical procedures.
What the right has said
Inferred right“Newsom's Teacher Leave Bill Would Put Taxpayers on Hook for Abortion Costs”
Right-leaning coverage zeroes in on the taxpayer dimension, framing the bill as a case of California using public education funding to subsidize abortion procedures without a direct legislative vote specifically on that question. The concern is that the abortion coverage entered the bill through broad statutory language rather than an explicit choice, which conservative framing presents as lawmakers either hiding the ball or failing to read what they passed. For critics on the right, the measure also deepens the entanglement of public-sector unions, Democratic governance, and abortion politics in a state they already view as a cautionary example. The specific focus on teachers, a unionized public workforce funded by state and local taxes, sharpens the taxpayer-accountability argument that right-leaning outlets typically deploy against expanded reproductive-health mandates.
New evidence casts doubt on RFK Jr testimony before Senate
Click here or title to expand full summarySenator Ron Wyden accuses US health agency of plan to deport more than 500 migrant children
Click here or title to expand full summaryTrump Keeps Undercutting Republicans’ Message, Squandering His Own Trifecta
Click here or title to expand full summaryWATCH: AOC won't rule out Senate bid after New York progressives notch primary wins: 'Inspired and encouraged'
Click here or title to expand full summaryChinese drone monopoly put on notice amid concerns over CCP spying: 'Strategic mistake'
Click here or title to expand full summaryWhat the left has said
Inferred left“Law Enforcement Drone Ban Raises Questions About Surveillance, Civil Liberties Tradeoffs”
Left-leaning coverage of this kind of legislation tends to foreground a layered set of concerns. On one hand, progressives are not unsympathetic to worries about foreign government data collection, particularly given the surveillance capabilities embedded in modern drone hardware. On the other hand, advocates in this space often note that expanding domestic drone use by law enforcement carries its own civil liberties risks, regardless of who manufactures the hardware. The $1.5 billion in proposed domestic manufacturing subsidies also invites scrutiny from those who track how industrial-policy dollars flow and who benefits. Coverage from the left typically asks whether the bill addresses community oversight of drone programs alongside the question of Chinese hardware, and whether American-made drones would face any stronger privacy guardrails than their Chinese counterparts.
What the right says
Right“Harrigan Bill Targets Chinese Drone Monopoly Threatening U.S. Law Enforcement Security”
Fox News framed this squarely as a national security and sovereignty issue, centering Rep. Harrigan's argument that allowing Chinese-made drones to operate inside American law enforcement is a strategic mistake with real intelligence consequences. The CCP spying angle is the load-bearing concern here: the worry that DJI hardware, regardless of intent, creates a potential channel for sensitive operational data to reach Beijing. Right-leaning coverage treats the $1.5 billion domestic manufacturing fund not as government spending to be scrutinized but as a necessary investment in American industrial independence, a contrast to what critics describe as decades of naive dependence on Chinese supply chains. The framing is less about police surveillance and more about whether the United States is willing to pay the short-term cost of decoupling from Chinese technology before a crisis forces the issue.
Florida Democrat says his state 'thankfully' doesn't have Democratic socialists like New York
Click here or title to expand full summaryWhat the left has said
Inferred left“Florida Democrat breaks with DSA after New York primary upsets spark intraparty debate”
Left-leaning coverage of this moment centers on what the New York DSA victories mean for the Democratic coalition. Progressive outlets tend to frame the upset wins as a sign of genuine grassroots energy, with working-class and younger voters pushing the party toward bolder economic positions. Moskowitz's comments read, in this frame, as a centrist Democrat anxious about a movement that has real momentum, particularly in urban districts with strong labor and tenant organizing infrastructure. The left framing foregrounds the question of whether moderate Democrats are reflecting their constituents or preemptively surrendering ground to a Republican Party that has moved far to its own extreme. Moskowitz is cast less as a pragmatist and more as a voice of institutional caution in a moment when activists argue caution has failed.
What the right says
Right“Democrat admits his party's socialist wing is a problem, praises Florida's moderate approach”
Right-leaning coverage treats Moskowitz's comments as a rare moment of Democratic candor, a sitting congressman from a major swing state openly acknowledging that democratic socialism is a political problem. Fox News frames the DSA primary victories in New York as evidence of a party being pulled leftward by an extreme flank, and Moskowitz's distancing as the exception that proves the rule. The right-leaning frame emphasizes that Florida Democrats have been punished at the ballot box and are now forced into a posture of moderation, while New York Democrats embrace socialism freely. Moskowitz becomes, in this telling, a useful figure: a Democrat willing to say what Republicans argue most of his colleagues privately believe but won't say aloud. The subtext is that the national Democratic Party cannot thread this ideological needle heading into future elections.
WATCH: Hearing derails as purple-haired Dem points finger, screams at chair to put DHS chief 'in his place'
Click here or title to expand full summaryWhat the left has said
Inferred left“DeLauro Confronts DHS Chief Over Border Crackdown as Supreme Court Backs Trump”
From the left, this moment lands as a rare instance of a Democrat refusing to let a Trump cabinet official run out the clock in a congressional hearing. Rosa DeLauro, one of the most senior Democrats in the House and a longtime appropriations hand, is cast here as a defender of oversight norms, demanding accountability from an administration that critics say treats congressional scrutiny as an inconvenience. The backdrop matters enormously to this framing: the Supreme Court's same-day immigration rulings, seen by progressive advocates as dangerous expansions of executive deportation power, made DeLauro's visible frustration feel less like a tantrum and more like a response to a genuine constitutional moment. Left-leaning coverage tends to foreground what provoked her rather than how she looked doing it.
What the right says
Right“Democrat Screams at Hearing Chair as DHS Chief Faces Border Grilling”
Fox News framed the hearing primarily around DeLauro's outburst, describing her as 'purple-haired' and leading with the image of a Democratic lawmaker screaming and pointing her finger at the committee chair rather than engaging substantively with DHS Secretary Mullin. In this telling, the disruption itself is It: a Democrat losing composure at a moment when, the framing implies, the administration is winning. The same-day Supreme Court immigration victories for the Trump team serve in right-leaning coverage as context that makes Democratic frustration look reactive and politically motivated. Mullin, framed as calm by contrast, represents the administration successfully executing on a border agenda that voters endorsed. The visual of a congressman demanding the chair 'put Mullin in his place' becomes evidence, for this audience, of Democratic dysfunction rather than legitimate oversight.
Mamdani-backed socialist wins in New York expose growing rift between Democratic establishment, insurgent left
Click here or title to expand full summaryTeenager cleared of murdering nine-year-old girl
Prosecutors want Lions' Arnold jailed until trial
MLB wants max 5 years for FAs changing teams
Copy of Sources: Hornets' Ball to Wolves for Reid, picks
Mayweather fight vs. Zambidis off, per court docs
Rays' combined no-hitter broken up in 9th vs. KC
Evert to miss Wimbledon after cancer recurrence
QB Williams' attempt to trademark 'Iceman' denied
⚾ MLB Power Rankings: A powerhouse returns
New NBA mock draft, for next year's class: Stack...
Double Ballon d'Or winner Putellas to join London City Lionesses
England can play on NZ memories of 2022 - Southee
Why it's time for Saka and Rashford - Shearer
NFL's Arnold 'primary conspirator' in alleged kidnapping
Hamilton and Ferrari a huge title threat - Russell
Lawal aims for NBA greatness after Briton is drafted
Late hope for England after day of New Zealand dominance with the bat
'One brings two'...eventually - England finally strike on first day
Rays lose no-hitter two outs shy of history against Royals: Craig Kimbrel allows ninth-inning home run
Free 2026 World Cup anytime goalscorer picks, odds: USA's Ricardo Pepi among best bets for Thursday
LaMelo Ball trade winners and losers: Timberwolves get Anthony Edwards the best backcourt mate of his career
Ecuador vs. Germany odds, picks, prediction, betting preview, start time for 2026 World Cup match on Thursday
Ivory Coast vs. Curacao odds, prediction, time: 2026 World Cup picks, best bets by expert on 18-8 roll
Reporter's Notebook: Lawmakers wrestle over whether AI can make the grade in America's classrooms
Click here or title to expand full summaryAI Is Designing Radio Chips That Humans Couldn't Even Imagine
Besimple AI (YC P25) Is Hiring
Show HN: OpenKnowledge, open source AI-first alternative to Obsidian/Notion
Show HN: I made Google Trends for Hacker News by indexing 18 years of comments
Political bias in AI: Where the AI models stand
RAMageddon just got extremely real
A Fatal Tesla Crash in Texas Sets Up a Legal Showdown
It’s a bad time to want a new computer
Notion killing Skiff-influenced email app since most users use AI agents instead
Apple and Audi Alumni Have Made a Luxe EV Based on the Moon Buggy
Google finally releases a Finance Android app, promises iOS version later in 2026
Anthropic says Alibaba must be punished for largest Claude cloning attack
Notion Mail is shutting down
Spain will require carriers to keep mobile networks live during power outages
Retroid's Pocket Nova is a very capable 4:3 handheld that costs $229
As everything gets more expensive, it's time to make do and mend
You may be plugging your Fire TV Stick into the wrong HDMI port
Apple will reportedly skip the M6 Pro and Max and jump straight to M7
Russia allegedly used a forensics platform to hack an activist's phone, despite having its access cut off
Samsung's latest budget phone has mild upgrades and a $50 price hike
Google Finance is now available as a standalone Android app
1945: 50 Nations Sign the Charter That Remade the World
Fifty delegations, representing peoples from every inhabited continent, gathered in San Francisco's Herbst Theatre on June 26, 1945, and signed a document they hoped would end war as an instrument of state policy. The United Nations Charter created a permanent international body with teeth: a Security Council empowered to authorize collective military action, a General Assembly where every member nation held a voice, and an International Court of Justice to arbitrate disputes. Architects of the new order included Jan Smuts of South Africa, who drafted pivotal preamble language, and foreign ministers from China, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and France, each signing for the great powers whose unanimity the Charter required. Ratification followed on October 24, now observed as UN Day, when the first General Assembly convened in London. Eight decades later, every international negotiation from climate accords to ceasefire resolutions still flows through the framework those fifty pens set in motion.
2015: Supreme Court Rules Same-Sex Marriage a Constitutional Right
"No longer may this liberty be denied", with those words, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion that rewrote American civil rights law. On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its 5, 4 decision in *Obergefell v. Hodges*, ruling that state bans on same-sex marriage violated the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantees of due process and equal protection. The case took its name from Jim Obergefell, an Ohio man who sued after his home state refused to list him as the surviving spouse on his husband's death certificate. Kennedy's majority opinion held that marriage represents one of the most fundamental liberties a person holds, and that denying it on the basis of sex could no longer stand. The ruling invalidated laws in the 13 states that still banned same-sex marriage and compelled every state to recognize existing same-sex unions. Nearly a decade later, *Obergefell* remains the legal cornerstone of marriage equality and a defining test of how the Court interprets constitutional liberty.