GaitherNews Escape the Algorithm
Today --°
Updated
Categories
Psychology 0 views

CA-MuSiC: a Culture-Aware Multilingual Skill Cognition Model for MOOC review understanding

Article excerpt

IntroductionMassive open online course (MOOC) reviews capture learners' emotional evaluations of course quality and perceived vocational value. Existing multilingual aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) methods typically predict generic opinion structures but rarely account for context-conditioned differences in evaluative expression or link…

IntroductionMassive open online course (MOOC) reviews capture learners' emotional evaluations of course quality and perceived vocational value. Existing multilingual aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) methods typically predict generic opinion structures but rarely account for context-conditioned differences in evaluative expression or link reviews to explicit skill perceptions.MethodsWe propose CA-MuSiC, a Culture-Aware Multilingual Skill Cognition Model for MOOC review understanding. In this study, “culture-aware” is used in an operational sense: the model uses language, platform/source, and course discipline as observable cultural-context proxies, rather than claiming to measure learners' cultural identities directly. CA-MuSiC combines cultural-context adaptation, external skill grounding from the Course-Skill Atlas and O*NET, hybrid extractive-generative prediction, and teacher-ensemble pseudo-label bootstrapping.ResultsExperiments on M-ABSA, EduRABSA, and an English-Chinese cross-lingual target-domain MOOC benchmark show that CA-MuSiC achieves the best results across TASD Micro-F1, ASQE F1, and Skill-grounded Sentiment Macro-F1, reaching 74.62, 61.45, and 69.88, respectively. Ablation studies indicate that skill grounding and pseudo-label bootstrapping are especially important for target-domain performance, whereas cultural-context adaptation improves cross-lingual robustness.DiscussionThese findings contribute to educational psychology and learning analytics by modeling MOOC reviews as emotionally expressed learner evaluations of perceived skill development, rather than as mere satisfaction signals.