GaitherNews Escape the Algorithm
Today --°
Updated
Categories
Business 2 sources 2 views

Warsh faces rate decision amid inflation and geopolitical pressure

Article excerpt

Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh confronts his most consequential decision yet this week as the central bank weighs competing pressures: persistent inflation on one side, geopolitical uncertainty on the other. This is only his second meeting leading the Fed, but the stakes are unusually high. The board itself is divided on whether to raise rates, with some officials concerned about inflation's grip on the economy and others wary of tightening policy while global tensions simmer. Market participants like Citadel Securities are positioning for a potential surprise rate hike, betting that Warsh will move more aggressively than recent Fed communications have signaled. The decision reflects a genuine tension in monetary policy right now: too little action risks allowing inflation to entrench itself further, but too much could risk economic slowdown or amplify market turbulence tied to foreign conflicts and instability.

Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh will face a challenge this week in deciding whether to raise interest rates as the central bank stares down high inflation and geopolitical uncertainty.

This will be Warsh’s second meeting leading the central bank, and his most challenging, as there appears to be a split on the Fed board over what should be done with interest rates. Investors are now uncertain about what the monetary policy committee will do, which is an infrequent occurrence.

HOW THE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL BECAME LAW: TRUMP LOCKS HORNS WITH GOP LAWMAKERS

Warsh can’t make interest rate policy decisions alone. Instead, the final decision comes through a vote of the Federal Open Market Committee. At Warsh’s June meeting, the vote to pause was unanimous. But this meeting is set to be more divided.

“I do think there will be serious advocacy at this meeting on the part of some, and about half of the committee favors a rate hike before year-end,” Dennis Lockhart, former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, told the Washington Examiner.

Lockhart said he thinks there is a case for hiking interest rates this week by a quarter of a percentage point to a range of 3.75% to 4%, although he predicts the Fed board will end up holding rates steady after its two-day meeting in Washington.

Heading into Fed meetings such as this one, there is usually little doubt about what the Fed will vote to do.

This time, though, investors seem to be unsure about what might happen.

As of Monday afternoon, the implied odds of a rate pause on Wednesday were about 62%, according to CME Group’s FedWatch tool, which calculates the probability of rate changes using futures contract prices for rates in the short-term market targeted by the Fed.

Investors assessed about a 38% chance the Fed would raise interest rates. Just a week ago, the odds of a rate hike at Wednesday’s meeting were only 16%.

Ryan Young, senior economist at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said that two key factors might be behind the shift. The first is the continued uncertainty with Iran and the ever-shifting question of when that war will end, along with when oil prices will fall.

Also, over the past week or so, the Trump administration has announced new tariffs, including three executive orders imposing 50% tariffs on various Canadian products using Section 338 of the Tariff Act, as well as new Section 301 tariffs on 60 countries.

Also, Young said there is another issue at play: the rising cost of borrowing attributable to the federal government’s mounting debt.

“There’s a third factor underneath the surface that I don’t think is getting enough attention, and that is long-term debt interest rates, those have been creeping up because of people losing faith in the government’s long-term finances,” Young told the Washington Examiner.

Warsh might see the importance of working to return inflation to the Fed’s 2% goal as helping restore confidence in the government.

“The more they do to fight inflation and solidify the government’s finances, the more that’ll do to help tame rising long-term debt interest rates a little bit,” Young said.

While there has been some good news on inflation in the form of the June consumer price index report, underlying price growth remains too high.

In the month of June alone, prices fell by 0.4%, the largest such decrease since 2020, according to the most recent report by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

But inflation was still 3.5% on the year ending in June.

Perhaps even worse, core inflation, which strips out the energy component and thus cannot be chalked up merely to the effects of the Iran conflict, is still too high. Core inflation was at 2.5% in June, according to the CPI.

!function(e,n,i,s){var d="InfogramEmbeds";var o=e.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];if(window[d]&&window[d].initialized)window[d].process&&window[d].process();else if(!e.getElementById(i)){var r=e.createElement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentNode.insertBefore(r,o)}}(document,"script","infogram-async","https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js");

And Warsh seems increasingly serious about bringing down inflation, even as President Donald Trump pushes for lower interest rates.

During recent testimony on Capitol Hill ahead of the July meeting, Warsh reiterated that his top goal is to see inflation return to healthy levels. He said that at his first Fed meeting as chairman, there was “no willingness to tolerate higher prices.”

“There was a commitment that was unambiguous and unanimous that we’re going to deliver,” the chairman said. “And we’re not finding acceptable the higher inflation that has endured in this country for more than five years.”

But heading into this week’s two-day Fed meeting, investors are still unsure what might happen.

Still, the majority of economic analysts seem to think the central bank will not raise rates. The Fed generally doesn’t like to spook markets, and indications of a rate change usually end up being messaged by Fed members ahead of the meeting or in leaks to the media, according to Mark Hamrick, chief economic analyst for the Hamrick Brief.

“In the modern history of the Federal Reserve, the tendency is to only shock the markets when they need, essentially, a shot of medicine, meaning there is something that’s akin to a crisis,” Hamrick told the Washington Examiner.

Hamrick said that it wouldn’t serve the markets well to be surprised with a rate hike this week, and, he argued, would even undermine the Fed’s credibility a bit.

“An argument can be made for a rate hike, and I imagine those arguments will be made around the table in the coming days among Federal Reserve Board members,” he added.

There is also the Trump factor at play. Since the start of his second term, the president has called for lower interest rates, further complicating Warsh’s quandary.

WARSH VOWS ‘UNAMBIGUOUS’ COMMITMENT FROM FED TO DRIVE DOWN INFLATION

Trump has given Warsh more leeway than his predecessor, Jerome Powell, on interest rate policy. The president was asked about whether he was concerned about the Fed raising rates on Monday, and Trump put the onus not on Warsh, but on the broader Fed board.

Trump said Warsh is “fantastic” and “wants to do the right thing,” but is dealing with a “political” board. Trump also said the United States should have the “lowest interest rate in the world.”