Artificial intelligence meets pediatric orthopedics: A comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, and Claude 3.5 in detecting supracondylar humeral fractures
Article excerpt
by Utku Murat Kalafat, Hüseyin Mutlu, Ramiz Yazıcı, Murat Genç, Bensu Bulut, Medine Akkan Öz, Ayşenur Gür, Mehmet Yortanlı, Uğur Şakar Background Supracondylar humeral fractures constitute 10, 16% of pediatric skeletal injuries, requiring timely diagnosis to prevent neurovascular complications. Developmental variations…
by Utku Murat Kalafat, Hüseyin Mutlu, Ramiz Yazıcı, Murat Genç, Bensu Bulut, Medine Akkan Öz, Ayşenur Gür, Mehmet Yortanlı, Uğur Şakar
Background Supracondylar humeral fractures constitute 10, 16% of pediatric skeletal injuries, requiring timely diagnosis to prevent neurovascular complications. Developmental variations in pediatric bone structures pose diagnostic challenges for clinicians. This study evaluated three next-generation large language models (LLMs) (ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, Claude 3.5) for detecting pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures and their classification according to the Gartland system.
Methods This retrospective observational study included 300 pediatric patients (150 with supracondylar humeral fractures confirmed by expert consensus, 150 without fractures) aged 2, 10 years presenting to the Emergency Department of the Bilkent City Hospital (October 2022-January 2025). Two-view elbow radiographs were presented to each LLM three times on different days. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using overall accuracy (all three responses correct), strict accuracy (≥2 correct responses), and ideal accuracy (≥1 correct response). Response consistency was assessed using Fleiss’ Kappa coefficient. Fractures were classified according to modified Gartland criteria.
Results Gemini 2.0 demonstrated highest sensitivity (68.4%) followed by Claude 3.5 (58.7%) and ChatGPT-4o (19.3%) for fracture detection (p Current LLMs demonstrate limited capability as independent diagnostic tools for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. Gemini 2.0’s 68.4% sensitivity indicates these technologies require specialized pediatric training before clinical implementation. However, their potential as assistive tools for triage and assessment warrants further development of pediatric-specific models.