STAT+: Trump administration pursues more durable changes to science policy after setbacks in court
Article excerpt
The White House has proposed sweeping changes to the bedrock regulation undergirding all federal contracts, empowering the executive branch to direct research, terminate grants, and external scientific reviews.
Thousands of federal civil servants who academic researchers see as partners in conducting their work were fired. An unprecedented number of scientific projects funded by previous administrations were terminated. Universities were pressured to abandon diversity programs and work to curb health disparities. On a Friday evening, the government tried to push through a dramatic change to how it reimburses universities for research overhead.
All of these actions in the first year of the Trump administration were rapidly challenged in federal court, in many cases resulting in the administration having to walk back policies because they ran afoul of the Administrative Procedures Act, which governs how new policies and regulations are rolled out.
Andrew Twinamatsiko, who is director of the Center for Health Policy and the Law at Georgetown University and runs a health care litigation tracker, describes what happened last year as “tempests that we could weather” until there’s a new administration, when “there can be ways of reverting back to the baseline that we used to have.”
Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…